Category Archives: Personal

Lessons in Solidarity

In 1984, members of the gay and lesbian community in England banded together to support the miners’ strike happening in the country in response to Margaret Thatcher’s economic policies. Despite the cultural differences and the often contentious relationship between the two groups, a commitment to solidarity and support brought these people together.

PRIDE (2014) photo from The Guardian

In the summer of 1985, after the strike ended, after nearly a year of fighting, and not with the outcome the strikers had hoped for, the miners lead the Gay Pride march in a show of solidarity with the community that had worked with them.

This is the story of the movie Pride which came out this year, where it one the Queer Palm award to Cannes.

Over the long weekend, here at UMass Amherst, three incidents of hate speech were written on the doors of students of color. This has not only shaken the community, for obvious reasons, but also brought with it an outpouring of emotion relating to the way the campus community treats students of color, the retention rate among students of color and the consistent failure of the community to address concerns regarding race on campus.

More often than not I have heard the words, “I am not surprised.” And that’s it. There is no further examination of that statement, there is no outrage, there is no anger or fear or sadness. There is a tacit acceptance of the fact that racism is alive and well on our campus.

Ben Schnetzer, as Mark Ashton, says in Pride, “I don’t understand how people can be for one thing and not another. How can you be for labor rights and not women’s right?” [badly paraphrased]. And as I look at this campus, I ask myself the same thing. How can we hope to make progress, together, if we won’t stand together? 

Schnetzer’s character is met halfway by one of the miners, Dai Donovan, played by Paddy Considine who refers to a banner his town has, of two hands clasped, where he explains that the way he sees it, the banner shows, “If you support me, I’ll support you.” And indeed, the National Union of Mineworkers voted to enshrine gay rights in the Labour Party’s platform, as well as leading the parade in ’85.

This is what we need; the solidarity, the community, and the will to fight the darkness of hatred and racism wherever it is hiding. Our black students should not be facing this alone, our hispanic students should not be facing this alone, students of color should not be facing this alone. We should take our cue from stories like that of the Lesbians and Gays Support the Miners. But we should also remember the miners, and our organized labor groups, all forms of organized peoples should be working to end this kind of behavior on our campus and in our community.

We are fighting for all of us.

Starting with the Bechdel Test

Let’s start a conversation with the Bechdel Test. Now I might be beating a dead horse here, but I’ve recently realized that knowledge of the Bechdel Test is not as widespread as I thought it was. I’ll drop it into conversation and people will suddenly look confused and I’ll have to backtrack and explain what it is.

The Bechdel Test

The Bechdel Test, alternately called the Bechdel/Wallace Test, the Bechdel Rule, Bechdel’s Law, or the Mo Movie Measure, is a simple set of rules that creates a rudimentary set of standards for female representation in movies (personally, I apply it to television as well). It made it’s appearance in 1985 in Alison Bechdel’s comic Dykes to Watch Out For.

Dykes to Watch Out For, 1985.

It has three rules:

1. A movie must have 2 female characters

2. They must have a conversation.

3. About something other than a man.

In theory this shouldn’t be too difficult to achieve. I would like to invite you now to take a moment and think back on the last five movies you saw and see if they pass the Bechdel Test. Continue reading

Lessons from the X-Men

I look at what’s happened, and still happening in Ferguson, the attention we’re currently paying to the senseless, needless deaths of young black people in this country, but I think also of the tallying every year of the deaths of trans* folks, the numbers of deaths and violations for native, black, and latina women, I think of the challenges women face daily. And somehow I end up at the X-Men.

Now, you probably think, “what the hell does a comic series/Marvel superheroes/beloved movie series and/or acclaimed series reboot have to do with all this serious political stuff?” or you might have just stopped reading.

But there is something very important lurking in the X-Men, and in that something is the reason why the X-Men are both so successful and often the only superhero comic non-superhero comic reading people have fallen for (Watchemn excluded, that is a discussion for another time). Continue reading

Building the “Personal Brand” — On Internships

There is a tension between the “personal brand” and the brand of the larger entity one works for.

It is especially true for interns. The intern has essentially agreed to work for free to “pad their resume” or, in other words, build their personal brand.

For people of certain skill-sets, the “personal brand” is less important. If you’re an engineer, or a student of another applied science, you can present lab work and other concrete examples of work you have done or participated in, and be judged on that (often you already have been, if a study is published and peer-reviewed).

But those who fall into a more “artisinal” category (designers, journalists, artists), people whose work is both becoming excessively commodified (“oh anyone can write/throw a webpage together/et. al.”), need a portfolio that clearly displays their skills to acquire work. With these areas becoming increasingly free-lance, it is even more critical.

Continue reading

Raising Hope; remembering that children need us, and we need them.

Last semester I raised my hand and class and said, “The thing about journalism is that even when you put it down, it’s still real. With fiction, if it becomes unpleasant or difficult, you can shut the book, put it down, and put it out of your mind. You can’t do that with journalism, it’s real. Even if you put it down, you still now that it’s happening out there, somewhere.”

Or something similar.

I just finished Gene Weingarten’s Fatal Distraction. He won the Pulitzer Prize for it. He made me go the bathroom of the Starbucks that I’m sitting in, and sit on the floor and cry.

The piece is about what happens when parents forget their kids in the car. Is it a mistake? Or is it a crime?

This past weekend I went to the 39th 24 Hour Boston Science Fiction Film Marathon. The second to last movie they played was Alfonso Cuarón’s The Children of Men. In an apocalyptic world, the movie imagines what happens when, 20 years after the human race has been rendered infertile, a woman becomes pregnant. I missed the beginning. But I walked into a world tinged with an acrid desperation, a world that has forgotten what innocence tastes like. In the climactic scene of the film, the cries of the infant create a ceasefire in a refugee camp that has descended into militarized chaos. The two protagonists carry the crying infant past awed refugees, who stop and stare, and get shot for a chance to see the child. People reach out, as if this miracle can bless them simply by witnessing it, soldiers put down their guns, fall to their knees, invoke the Lord, and cross themselves. The second they are past them, the fighting begins anew.

When I was in high school, I suffered from undiagnosed anxiety, that manifested depressive episodes. I remember moving through one long stretch that felt like a haze of meaninglessness. I went to bed, dreamt and woke up terrified of the inevitable apocalypse; the coming plague, the hurricanes and tidal waves that would raze all signs of civilization and crush me. Meanwhile, family friends had a child.

One morning we congregated at the local coffee shop and another family friend passed around her cellphone with pictures of the infant, who had moved with his parents to England. I remember looking at pictures of this tiny human and thinking that any world that would allow us to bring new life into the world like that could not be the nightmare that I saw every day. For the first time in months, I felt some measure of peace.

Though my memory has erased the timing and sequence, the memory recalls immediately another of the same child. I was pressed into staying with the child for an evening, to look after him while his parents went out. I had previously avoided being made responsible of any child that was not of an age at which they would be able to express their desires, fears, and frustrations to me, verbally.

The majority of the night is lost to my feeble recollection. But I remember how heavy and warm the child was in my arms as I sat in the rocking chair in the front room of the apartment. This tiny bundled up person weighed more than seemed reasonable for one so small. And he radiated such heat. Even now, I remember that feeling and wonder how parents ever put their children down. The feeling of him in my arms eclipses even my recollection of his features.

Lately the subject of children has been everywhere. In class we have read interviews with child molesters, in the news discussions of Woody Allen’s possible child abuse have flamed anew following An Open Letter from Dylan Farrow in the New York Times, I have grappled with my feelings regarding the identification of minors accused of crimes or undergoing trial (pick any school shooting or assault), in the media. And on all of these subjects my usual willingness to listen to the other side has made its absent noticeably apparent.

The willingness of the world to expose children to things that will hurt them, harm them, disturb and destroy them, often in the name of our own, adult, satisfaction has become an inexcusable crime. The wounds of childhood never fully heal.

It seems simplistic to express the desire for a world where every single child is protected and loved. We all want such things for whomever comprises the concept of “the children”.

Meanwhile, we are willfully blind to the ways in which we will not take action the manifestation of such a reality. We will not put in caveats for child safety into bills in Congress for fear of auto manufacture lobbyists. We can’t find ways to sell a device that will work to prevent children from being forgotten in cars by parents who wish them no harm.

The adult world is one of ego. When we exit the trappings of childhood (at whatever age that may strike) we learn that no one else can be fully trusted. The protective layers we carry with us to make it bearable to wake up every day in that world are what make up our pride, our will, and our sense of self-respect. That is what makes the world of Cuarón’s Children of Men so hostile.

And that is what we need to put aside, in the name of protecting those tiny beings who give us the hope, the drive, and the ability to be better than adulthood makes us.